SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11576

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PUNEET KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10559-2025 DECIDED ON: 07.03.2025 PUNEET KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.

Present: Mr. Shailesh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner (through VC mode).

Mr. Manish Bansal, PP, UT, Chandigarh.

SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL)

1. On 03.03.2025, following order was passed by this Court:-

1. In the present petition, seeking interim bail to the petitioner, on 25.02.2025, following order was passed by this Court:-

“1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 BNSS read with Section 528 BNSS for grant of interim bail to the petitioner for a period of 14 days, in case, FIR No.115 dated 28.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 21 & 29 NDPS Act (Sections 25-54-59 of the Arms Act added later on), registered at Police Station – South, Sector 34, District UT, Chandigarh, on account of marriage of the real brother of the petitioner, which is fixed for

05.03.2025 at Ferozepur City, Punjab.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case, neither any recovery of the contraband has been effected from the petitioner, nor he is found involved in any other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top