SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 10544

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAAN MOHD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 03.03.2025 Pronounced on: 11.03.2025 Jaan Mohd. ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen K. Sheoran, D.A.G., Haryana.

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

25 12.03.2024 Sadar Sohna, 379, 465, 467, 468, 471, 411, District Gurugram 34, 420, 120-B, 201 IPC

1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above came before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.

2. Per paragraph 11 of the status report, the accused has the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No. FIR No. Date Offenses Police Station

1. 317/2023 - 457, 380 IPC Shahjahpur 2. 279/2021 - 379 IPC HSIDC Bari

3. 548/2021 - 379 IPC Tosham

4. 427 26.06.2024 411 IPC and Arms Act Sadar Gurugram

5. 191/2024 - 397 IPC Jhajjar

6. 12/2023 - 379, 411 IPC Rasoolpur

3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, which reads as follows:

“3. That the brief facts of the case are that that on 12.03.2024, complainant Rakesh Sharma presented an appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top