205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 17.03.2025 Santosh Kumari ....Petitioner Versus Sunil Kumar and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Sukhsharan Sra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kuldeep Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Pannu, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition is preferred against the judgment dated 11.03.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, vide which judgment of conviction dated 04.04.2013 and order of sentence dated 05.04.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Gurgaon, in complaint bearing No.5298 dated 12.05.2010 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act titled as ‘Sunil Kumar Vs. Santosh Kumari.’

2. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Gurgaon, vide judgment dated 04.04.2013 and was sentenced as mentioned below: