SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 353

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JOGINDER PAL BUDHIRAJA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
DARIYAI LAL AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH Court OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 18.03.2025 Joginder Pal Budhiraja and others ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Dariyai Lal and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Tarun Dhingra, Advocate for the appellants.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J. CM-6659-C-2022 Prayer in this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is for condonation of delay of 1 day in filing the accompanying appeal.

Heard.

For the reasons mentioned in the application which is supported by an affidavit of the applicant/appellant No.1, the same is allowed and delay of 1 day in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned.

RSA-1895-2022 (O&M)

The plaintiff is in second appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the ld. Courts below, whereby the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs for declaration and partition, as well as permanent injunction, has been dismissed with costs by both the Courts below.

2. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status before the learned trial Court i.e. the appellants are the ‘plaintiffs’; and the respondents are the ‘defendants’.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants/plaintiffs filed the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top