SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11899

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJWINDER SINGH ALIAS LABBU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 06.03.2025 Pronounced on: 18.03.2025 Rajwinder Singh @ Labbu ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Ms. Anju Sharma Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Amit Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab.

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

399 17.09.2023 Goindwal Sahib, Distt. 21-C, 61, 85 of NDPS Act Tarn Taran and Section 489 IPC

1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.

2. In paragraph 17 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents. However, as per paragraph 9 of the status report, the accused has the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No. FIR No. Dated Offenses Police Station

1. 27 24.02.2022 365 IPC Sirhali, Distt. Tarn Taran

2. 116 13.04.2022 25/27 of Arms Act Harike and 307/34/506 IPC

3. 240 04.07.2024 22 of NDPS Act and Goindwal Sahib

42 of Prison Act

3. The facts and allegations are taken from the status report filed by the State. On 17.09.2023, bas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top