SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11917

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KULDIP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 Kuldip Singh ......Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

****

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to issue him belt number as well as appointment letter.

2. The petitioner, pursuant to Advertisement No. 4/2020 dated 30.12.2020, applied for the post of Constable under BCA category. He successfully cleared all the tests. The respondent conducted verification of his credentials and found that he was facing criminal proceedings at the time of filing application, thus, he was not eligible to participate in the selection process. The respondent did not issue him appointment letter.

3. Mr. Robin Dutt, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has duly disclosed factum of pending FIR in his application form. The respondent till the conclusion of selection process did not object to his candidature and refused to is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top