SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 358

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


271-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 Manjinder Singh ... Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG Punjab.

***

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J.(Oral)

1. The present petition has been preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter ‘Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 24.11.2021(Annexure P-5) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Khanna vide which the petitioner has been directed to deposit 20% of the cheque amount as interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’), in the case stemming from NACT case No.70 dated 27.01.2020 filed under Section 138 of the NI Act, titled as ‘M/s Sohan Lal Trading Company vs.

Manjinder Singh.’

2. Briefly, the facts, as alleged, are that the petitioner approached respondent No.2-complainant to sell his crops through it. The petitioner had taken cash advance multiple times from respondent No.2, after making due entries in the record books. Respondent No.2 h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top