SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11971

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHETAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision: 08.05.2025 ****

Chetan Kumar ... Petitioner VS.

State of Haryana ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL ****

Present: Mr. Akshay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for Mr. Pawan Kumar Hooda, Advocate for for the petitioner Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG Haryana ****

Sandeep Moudgil, J. (Oral)

(1). This petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the FIR No.305 dated 27.09.2024 (Annexure P1) under Sections 61(1)(a) of Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (Haryana Amendment Bill, 2020) registered at Police Station Manesar, District Gurugram along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

(2). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the prosecution case, the petitioner was found driving a Honda City car wherefrom the police is said to have seized a crate containing 12 bottles of Kingfisher beer, without permit/licence. It is argued that FIR is frivolous for the reason that the petitioner along with two other friends had purchased the said beer carton from Ms/ Discovery Liquor House for an amount of Rs.1700/- and the bill to that effect is appended as Annexure P2.

(

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top