IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HAWA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
APURVA
2025.05.16 17:06 (Annexure P-8) passed by the learned Financial Commissioner, Haryana.
2. Briefly, the petitioner claims to be a co-sharer of the land comprised in Khewat No.216, measuring 161 Kanal-12 Marla (as per Jamabandi for the year 2006-07), situated at Village Dhanana, Tehsil and District Bhiwani.
2.1 It appears that respondents No.5 and 6 herein, being the co-owners of the aforesaid land, submitted an application before the Assistant Collector, 2nd Grade, Bhiwani, thereby seeking partition of their share, out of the joint land. In the said partition proceedings, petitioner herein was proceeded against ex parte, and thereafter, the partition came to be concluded upon drawing of Sanad Takseem (Instrument of Partition) vide order dated 12.08.2013 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Assistant Collector, 2nd Grade, Bhiwani.
2.2 Petitioner claims that when he came to know about the said partition, he immediately filed an application before the Assistant Collector, 2nd Grade, Bhiwani, seeking setting aside of ex parte proceedings, however, the same was dismissed, vide order dated 24.12.2015 (Annexure P-5), primarily on the ground that Sanad Takseem already stands issued on
12.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.