SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 238

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MONA A. SREENIVAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

1. CRR 1641 of 2019 Date of Decision:12.05.2025 Mona A Sreenivas ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana ... Respondent

2. CRR 1716 of 2019 Tekan Raj ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present : Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner in CRR-1641-2019.

Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner in CRR-1716-2019.

Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, DAG, Haryana.

N.S.SHEKHAWAT , J.

1. This order shall dispose off two connected revision petitions, i.e., CRR-1641 of 2019 titled as “Mona A. Sreenivas Vs. The State of Haryana” and CRR-1716 of 2019 titled as “Tekan Raj Vs. State of Haryana” as both the petitions have been preferred before this Court against the same impugned order dated 04.07.2019 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Kaithal, whereby, the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning the petitioners as additional accused, was allowed.

2. The brief facts, which are necessary for the adjudication of the controversy involved in the present case, are that on 28.04.2012, an official letter was sent by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal, for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top