SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 10691

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-16.05.2025 Shankar Kashyap and others ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. Amandeep Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Vishal Kashyap, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Vikramjeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI J.(Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No.190 dated 10.09.2022, under Sections 323, 342, 354, 406, 498-A and 506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Panjokhra, District Ambala alongwith all other consequential proceedings based upon compromise.

2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the present FIR was lodged arising out of a matrimonial dispute between the petitioners and respondent No. 2, which has now been amicably settled between the parties with the intervention of respectables. He submitted that the petitioners are neither habitual offenders nor they are declared as proclaimed offenders in the present case and therefore, no useful purpose will be served in case further proceedings are carried on. He al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top