IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)-710-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 16.05.2025 Malkeet Singh ....Petitioner(s)
Versus Bakshish Kaur .....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Kuljit Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Yogesh Kumar Aneja, Advocate, for the petitioner.
****
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral)
1. The present revision petition has been filed challening the impugned order dated 18.02.2025 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Amritsar by which maintenance of Rs. 12,500/- per month has been granted to the respondent-wife.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in the present case the respondent-wife was not entitled for maintenance in view of the fact that the respondent-wife has not been able
of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure could not have been
invoked and such maintenance could not have been granted. He also
submitted that there was no child born and the allegations made by the
respondent-wife that they have cohabited together are false since there was
no relationship between them and therefore, the impugned order may be set aside.
3. I have heard the lea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.