SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 241

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KARNAIL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. – Respondent


116+202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1034-2019 (O&M)

DECIDED ON: 16.05.2025 KARNAIL SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

.....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Surender Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate for respondent no.2.

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

CRM-19961-2025 Application is allowed, as prayed for.

Annexure A-1 on behalf of respondent No.2 namely Dharam Pal Kapoor, is taken on record.

CRR-1034-2019

1. The present revision petition has been preferred against judgment of conviction dated 11.08.2015 and order of sentence dated 12.08.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bilaspur vide which the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of NI Act and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and pay compensation of Rs.6,50,000/- to the respondent No.1/complainant and the judgment dated 24.04.2019 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

2. On perusal of order dated 04.04.2025, it is evident that a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top