IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Date of Decision: 02.07.2025.

Dharampal Yadav ....Appellant.

VERSUS Satish Kumar and others ....Respondents.

***

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA ---

Present: Mr. Udit Mendiratta, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.3.

****

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

This appeal by the complainant is directed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, dated 06.04.2021, whereby the Criminal Appeal preferred by respondents No.1 and 2-accused against their conviction recorded by the Trial Court, vide judgment dated 16.08.2018, had been allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Appellate Court has erroneously accepted the appeal although there was cogent evidence warranting the conviction of respondent No.1 and the findings of the Trial Court were well reasoned and did not call for any interference. He also submits that mere corrections in the revenue record later would be of no consequence as the offence was complete when the entry in the mutation was carri