IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MAMTA YADAV – Appellant
Versus
BALRAJ AND ANR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :02.07.2025 Mamta Yadav ......Petitioner Versus Balraj and another ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Mohit, Advocate and Mr. Pavitra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2 despite service.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J . (Oral) :
The present revision petition is directed against the order dated
12.11.2024 (Annexure P-4), passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Fatehabad, vide which the application moved by the petitioner under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’), for stay of civil suit instituted by respondent No.1 was dismissed.
2. A Civil Suit No.76 of 2021 was instituted by the petitioner (Mamta Yadav) against respondent No.1-Balraj and one Jagdish for mandatory injunction, declaration and permanent injunction etc.
3. The case set up was that the plaintiff and her family had sought the help of defendants in obtaining a buffalo loan of Rs.3,50,000/- in lieu of which the defendants got certain few blank papers signed from the plaintiff. Two blank cheques were also signed and w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.