SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMARJIT SINGH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
BALKAR SINGH AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (111)

RSA-3482-2018 (O&M)

Date of decision:- 02.07.2025 Amarjit Singh and others ... Appellants Versus Balkar Singh and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the appellants.

****

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL

1. Appellants/plaintiffs are in second appeal before this Court assailing the concurrent finding recorded by the two Courts.

2. Plaintiffs filed a suit for partition of a residential house (hereinafter referred to as “the suit property”) and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating it. It has been pleaded that their predecessor, Hari Singh, was the owner of the house and after his death, his three sons, Jarnail Singh, Karnail Singh and Kartar Singh inherited his estate. The suit property fell to the share of Kartar Singh, who died issue- less and after the death of his widow, Surjit Kaur, her estate was inherited by Jarnail Singh and Karnail Singh. When Jarnail Singh died, defendant No.1 inherited his estate being his son. Karnail Singh also expired and plaintiff No.1 and Narinder Singh acquired his estate. After the death of Narinder Sing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top