IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

254 ARB-529-2024 Date of Decision: 02.07.2025 Shufab …Applicant Versus Wipro Enterprises Private Limited …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocate for the applicant Ms. Diya Sodhi, Advocate and Ms. Karishma Sharma, Advocate for the respondents ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. Through instant application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘1996 Act’), the applicant is seeking appointment of an Arbitrator.

2. The respondent issued offer letters to the applicant who in turn sent purchase order. A dispute erupted between the parties. The applicant served notice upon the respondent seeking resolution of dispute through Arbitral Tribunal but to no avail.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that there was offer by respondent to applicant with respect to supply of machines for manufacturing shoe. There was no arbitration clause in the said offer letter. The machines were manufactured as per purchase order placed by the applicant. Advance sale consideration was also deposited by the applicant.

The machines were supplied and the applicant p