116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 03.07.2025 SATISH KUMAR AND ORS ....Petitioners Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Ashutosh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl. Solicitor General of India with Ms. Shalini Atri, Advocate, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents No.1 and 2-UOI.

* * * * *

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had impugned the order dated 03.02.2025 passed by Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chandigarh by preferring an appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi. He also submits that the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi is not functioning as the Chairperson is on leave for more than a month and the petitioners are being dispossessed by the respondent-Bank from the secured asset as the possession notice had been issued on 28.05.2025 for taking possession of the property on 26.06.2025. He, therefore, submits that his case be transferred to another Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal to enable expeditious disposal of his