SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MONU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 04.07.2025 MONU ...Appellant VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Ravinder Bangar, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab.

****

SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J.(ORAL)

1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant challenging Impugned Judgment of Conviction and Order of Quantum of Sentence dated 21.12.2017 vide which the appellant was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10 years and with fine for the alleged recovery of stolen gold articles. The appellant was sentenced as under:-

Offence Conviction Fine In default
Section 328/34 of IPC RI for 05 years each Rs.5,000/- To further undergo RI for 01 year
379-B/34 of IPC RI for 10 years Rs.10,000/- Further undergo RI for 02 years
120-B of IPC RI for 05 years Rs.5,000/- Further undergo RI for 01 year
411 of IPC RI for 02 years Rs.2,000/- Further undergo RI for 06 months

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant contends that he does not want to challenge the conviction of the appellant on merits.

However, he submits that in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top