SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 13005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUKHPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

101 CRM-M-34026-2025 Decided On: 04.07.2025 SUKHPAL SINGH ....PETITIONER(s)

Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....RESPONDENT(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. S. K. Garg Narwana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Vig, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Sachdeva, Advocate and Mr. Mukul Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner.

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral)

The petition has been filed under Section 482 BNSS seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR no.128 dated 26.06.2025, Annexure P-1, registered under Section 353(2) BNS, at Police Station City Budhlada, District Mansa.

2. The provision of Section 482(1) BNSS, providing for grant of bail to a person apprehending arrest is pari materia to Section 438(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (since repealed). It gives concurrent jurisdiction to the High Court and the Court of Session for grant of bail to a person apprehending arrest on accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence. The petitioner is accused of the offences alleged as per the FIR aforementioned, and has straightaway approached this Court for grant of pre- arrest bail without first approaching the Sessions Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top