SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 154

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TEJ RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH.

209 CWP-7510-2017 (O&M).

Date of Decision: 07.07.2025.

TEJ RAM ... Petitioner(s)

Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.

Present: Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

Prayer in the present petition is for directing the respondents to count petitioner’s service rendered on daily wage for grant of retiral benefits and to release the revised retiral benefits along with interest @18% per annum.

2 The facts arising from the present petition are that the Petitioner was appointed on daily wages in August, 1987 and he worked continuously till 31.03.1993. Later on, his services were regularized on the post of Mali cum Chowkidar in the office of Respondent no.5. The petitioner retired on 31.07.2014. After his retirement, a PPO number was issued by Respondent no.2, however the retiral benefits were paid only after taking into consideration the regular service period i.e. from 01.04.1993 to 31.07.2014 and the daily wage service rendered by the petitioner was not counted for computing retiral benefits.

3 Petitioner sent a l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top