SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 18344

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VED MURARI LAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: April 09, 2025 Pronounced on : July 08, 2025 VED MURARI LAL SHARMA -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate with Mr. P.S. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, D.A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Narender Kumar Vashist, Sr. Panel Counsel for the respondent No.2-U.O.I.

(Through V.C.)

Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate for the respondent No.7.

***

KULDEEP TIWARI, J.

1. The hereinafter extracted directions, as embodied in the order dated 13.03.2023 drawn by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (hereinafter referred to as the ‘National Commission’), caused pain to the petitioner and consequently propelled him to institute thereagainst the instant writ petition.

“After a detailed hearing of the case, the commission found that the police arrested the applicant in a false FIR lodged by the opposite party namely Ved Murari Lal Sharma, without looking at the facts, which was unjustified. Apart from this, there is a difference between the records of the Municipal Corporation and the records presented by the applicant. The opposite party has tri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top