270 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6077-2022 Date of decision : 08.07.2025 Dharampal ....Petitioner Versus Krishan and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1 PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

Instant revision petition is directed against order dated

31.10.2022 passed by Ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Charkhi Dadri whereby application filed by plaintiff seeking withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh on the same cause of action, has been allowed.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Trial Court wrongly allowed the application after the petitioner has been made to face prolonged ordeal of trial for 7 years without there being any formal defect. He submits that only formal defect that was spelled out in the application was that the State of Haryana and the Revenue Department which were necessary parties were not impleaded and the appropriate relief could not be sought. He submits that he is ready to give concession that the necessary parties in form of State of Haryana and Revenue Department be allowed to be impleaded a