IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on : 08.07.2025 Munni Devi(since deceased) through her LR ...... Petitioner Versus Jagdish Rai ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***

Present : Ms. Sweta Beniwal, Advocate for Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Thapar, Advocate for the respondent.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL , J (ORAL)

This is landlady’s revision petition against the order dated

16.05.2019, passed by the Appellate Authority, Rohtak, dismissing the appeal preferred against the order dated 28.02.2018, passed by the Court of learned Rent Controller, Rohtak, vide which the eviction petition filed by the petitioner-

landlady was dismissed.

2. The petitioner-landlady (Smt. Munni Devi) instituted a petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rent Act’) against the respondent-tenant (Jagdish Rai). The case set up was that the petitioner-landlady was the owner of two shops bearing Nos.1094 and 1095, situated in Jain Cloth Market, Rohtak and the respondent-tenant was in possession of shop No.1094 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the demised premises’) at a month