IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:09.07.2025 Manish Kumar ......Petitioner versus Rajni and another ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. Manu Loona, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anmol Puri, Advocate for the respondents.

*****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI J.(Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been filed assailing the order dated 08.01.2024 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sri Muktsar Sahib, whereby an interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month has been granted to respondent No.1-wife and Rs.5,000/- per month has been granted to respondent No.2-minor daughter of the age of 8 years.

2. At the time of issuance of notice of motion, learned counsel for the petitioner had restricted his claim only to the extent of interim maintenance as directed to be paid to respondent No.1-wife and not to respondent No.2. In other words, learned counsel for the petitioner has withdrawn his claim regarding respondent No.2-minor daughter in the present petition and has pressed only regarding respondent No.1-wife.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner argued that challenge in the present revi