SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 13507

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GEETU RAM – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 09.07.2025 Geetu Ram ... Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2. None for respondent No.3.

****

JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (oral)

1. Instant petition has been filed seeking setting aside of order dated 08.04.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sonipat to Panchkula.

2. The petitioner at present is working with the respondents as a Superintending Engineer. He is posted at Sonipat. By the impugned order, he has been transferred to Commercial Back Office, UHBVNL, Panchkula.

3. On 16.04.2025, the following order was passed :

“Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is a case where the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-3), whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sonipat to Panchkula and is currently working as a Superintending Engineer. He submitted that although transfer is an incidence of service and a prerogative of the employer, who may transfer any e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top