IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GEETU RAM – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 09.07.2025 Geetu Ram ... Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2. None for respondent No.3.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (oral)
1. Instant petition has been filed seeking setting aside of order dated 08.04.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sonipat to Panchkula.
2. The petitioner at present is working with the respondents as a Superintending Engineer. He is posted at Sonipat. By the impugned order, he has been transferred to Commercial Back Office, UHBVNL, Panchkula.
3. On 16.04.2025, the following order was passed :
“Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is a case where the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-3), whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Sonipat to Panchkula and is currently working as a Superintending Engineer. He submitted that although transfer is an incidence of service and a prerogative of the employer, who may transfer any e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.