SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 35

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 24.07.2025.

Date of pronouncement: 25.08.2025 1. CWP No. 6374 of 2000 (O&M)

Anil Kumar Gupta …. Petitioner versus The State of Haryana and others …. Respondents

2. CWP No. 14371 of 2020 (O&M)

Pardeep Kumar Jain …. Petitioner versus The State of Haryana and others .… Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

*****

ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J.

These two writ petitions have been filed primarily assailing Rules 9 and 12 of the Punjab Service of Engineers Class-II, Public Works Department (Public Health) Rules, 1966 (for short “the 1996 Rules”) as ultra vires to the Constitution of India, insofar as they do not provide for promotion from the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) to the post of Sub- Divisional Engineer (Civil) upon acquiring the qualification of AMIE, as provided in Rule 7(3)(ii) of the Rules of 1966, from the date of acquiring the requisite qualification/eligibility. In addition, thereto, an order passed on

18.06.2020 rejecting t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top