IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AMARJIT SINGH AND ORS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 25.08.2025 Rajinder Singh ...Appellant(s)
Vs.
Amarjit Singh and others ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Navjeet Singh, Advocate for the appellant through V.C. None for the respondents.
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
Present Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 24.08.2013 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana; whereby Civil Appeal filed by respondent/plaintiff against dismissal of his suit for permanent injunction by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana vide judgment and decree dated 23.02.2012, has been allowed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant/defendant submits that the learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana was in error in passing the impugned judgment and decree by ignoring the fact that respondent No.1 had concealed the factum of compromise from the learned appellate Court. It is submitted that the Learned Lower Court has specifically held that the above said suit is not maintainable against the co-sharer who is in joint possession with the plaintiff-respondents and so the appellant cannot be restraine
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.