SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 84

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AMARJIT SINGH AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 25.08.2025 Rajinder Singh ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Amarjit Singh and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Navjeet Singh, Advocate for the appellant through V.C. None for the respondents.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 24.08.2013 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana; whereby Civil Appeal filed by respondent/plaintiff against dismissal of his suit for permanent injunction by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana vide judgment and decree dated 23.02.2012, has been allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant/defendant submits that the learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana was in error in passing the impugned judgment and decree by ignoring the fact that respondent No.1 had concealed the factum of compromise from the learned appellate Court. It is submitted that the Learned Lower Court has specifically held that the above said suit is not maintainable against the co-sharer who is in joint possession with the plaintiff-respondents and so the appellant cannot be restraine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top