IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: August 25, 2025 Chaudhary Devinder Singh @ Devinder Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Balbir Kaur and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: Mr.Anurag Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

None for respondents No.1 and 2.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated

04.03.2021 passed by learned trial Court, thereby, allowing application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, with a direction to the petitioner-plaintiff to affix ad valorem Court fee with the plaint, as per sale consideration of the sale deed in question, failing which, the plaint shall be liable to be rejected.

The petitioner-plaintiff had filed a suit for declaration to the effect that sale deed bearing No.2565/1 dated 20.01.2009 and sale deed No.110 dated 20.04.2009, are illegal, null and void and not binding upon the rights of the petitioner-plaintiff and the impugned judgment and decree passed in civil suit is also wrong, erroneous and not binding upon the rights of the petitioner-plaintiff.

Besides the same, also further claimed a decree for possession to the effect that the petitioner-plaintif