108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 26.08.2025 Parteek ..... Petitioner Versus Swati .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shalini Singh Nagpal J.

CRM No.33583-2025 An application under Section 528 BNSS for placing on record Annexure P-1 to P-8 filed. In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, same stands allowed and Annexure P-1 to P-8 placed on record.

CRR(F) No.1232-2025 (O&M)

1. Order dated 07.08.2025 of learned Principal District Judge (Family Court), Bhiwani, awarding interim maintenance of Rs.12,000/- to the respondent-wife has been challenged in this Revision Petition.

2. The only argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that learned Family Court, while assessing interim maintenance allowance failed to consider the fact that the respondent-wife was highly qualified and as per her Income Tax Return for the year 2021-2022, her annual income was Rs.3,89,623/-. He further submitted that even though petitioner was working in State Bank of India and his gross salary was more than Rs.1,00,000/-, his carry home salary was only Rs.39,821/- per mo