SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 14063

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-26.08.2025 Ravi ......Petitioner.

Vs.

State of Haryana ......Respondent.

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. T.P. Singh, Senior DAG Haryana.

***

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL The Prayer in this petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No.32 dated 04.02.2025 under Sections 20(B)(ii)(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Rai, District Sonipat.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Naveen and Pardeep were apprehended with 20 KG 770 grams of Ganja. Based on the disclosure statement of arrested accused, the petitioner-Ravi was nominated as accused. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He contends that the name of the petitioner figured in the disclosure statement of his co- accused. Pursuant to his arrest, no recovery of any contraband have been effected. Reliance is placed on the judgments in the cases of Tofan Singh Versus State of Tamil Nadu, 2020 AIR (Supreme Court) 5592

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top