IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7161-2025 Date of Decision:- 26.08.2025 Sonu ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Rahul Kumar Adia, Advocate for the petitioner (through Video Conferencing).
Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG, Punjab.
****
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.(Oral)
1. Petitioner Sonu has filed present petition seeking appropriate direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, directing official respondents No. 3 and 4 to provide adequate protection of life and liberty to petitioner and his family from the threats, harassment and false implication at the hands of respondents No. 5 and 6 against whom petitioner has earlier lodged two cases of attempt to murder, with further direction to expedite investigation in FIR No. 36 dated 06.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered under Section 137(2), 87, 70(2), 351, 127, 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Section 6 of POCSO Act at Police Station Majitha Road, Amritsar and to exclude the name of petitioner’s son who is falsely implicated at the instance of respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.