SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 XXXXX ....Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, Advocate Mr. Pradeep Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Himanshu Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vishal Kashyap, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P., U.T., Chandigarh and Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, APP, U.T., Chandigarh.

Mr. Navjit Singh, Central Government Counsel for the Union of India.

Mr. Ravi Sharma, Standing Counsel and Mr. Raywant Kaushish, Advocate for National Medical Commission (NMC).

Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Advocate for the PGIMER, Chandigarh.

Mr. M. S. Randhawa, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate as Amicus Curiae with Ms. Simran, Advocate, Mr. Vibhu Agnihotri, Advocate, Mr. Pushp Jain, Advocate, Ms. Hanima Grewal, Advocate.

****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J .

A. FACTUAL MATRIX

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2. While looking at the Medico-Legal Report filed by the resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top