IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 XXXXX ....Petitioner(s)
Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, Advocate Mr. Pradeep Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Himanshu Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Kashyap, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P., U.T., Chandigarh and Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, APP, U.T., Chandigarh.
Mr. Navjit Singh, Central Government Counsel for the Union of India.
Mr. Ravi Sharma, Standing Counsel and Mr. Raywant Kaushish, Advocate for National Medical Commission (NMC).
Mr. Avinit Avasthi, Advocate for the PGIMER, Chandigarh.
Mr. M. S. Randhawa, Advocate for respondent No.2.
Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate as Amicus Curiae with Ms. Simran, Advocate, Mr. Vibhu Agnihotri, Advocate, Mr. Pushp Jain, Advocate, Ms. Hanima Grewal, Advocate.
****
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J .
A. FACTUAL MATRIX
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
2. While looking at the Medico-Legal Report filed by the resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.