IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 07.08.2025 Pronounced on: 27.08.02025 Suraj ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Sarvesh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Dr. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
764 08.12.2024 Shivaji Colony, 22-C of NDPS Act (Section Rohtak 29 added later on)
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.
2. Per paragraph 9 of the bail petition, custody certificate dated 06.08.2025 as well as reply dated 05.08.2025, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
3. The facts and allegations are taken from the reply filed by the State. On 07.12.2024 based on prior information, the Police seized 13 vials of Wincirex syrup from the petitioner’s possession. The Investigator claims to have complied with all the statutory requirements of the NDPS Act, 1985, and BNSS 2023.
4. The petitioner's counsel seeks bail on the grounds of prolonged pretrial custody.
5. The petitioner's counsel prays for ba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.