250 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on 27.08.2025 Pronounced on 28.08.2025 Tarsem …… Appellant Versus State of Haryana and Another ....… Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Kshitij Bharati, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Kamal Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.

*****

1. The appeal under Section 14 A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 challenges order dated 28.07.2025 of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa vide which application for anticipatory bail of the appellant in FIR No.136 dated 15.06.2025 under Sections 115/76/79 of BNS and Section 3(1)(w) of the SC/ST Act, P.S. Kalan Wali, District Dabwali, Haryana was dismissed.

2. Facts of the case, relevant for determining the controversy are that Parveen Kaur wife of Vinod Kumar, stated in her complaint to the police that she was running a beauty parlour in Sirsa. On 13.06.2025, she was standing at Pipli Bus Stand with her husband. At about 9:00 PM, while they were talking with Gora Singh son of Chhota Singh, Tarsem Sharma son of Vijay Sharma, resident of Pipli ca