SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 14390

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AARTI KUMARI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9380-2025 Date of Decision:28.08.2025 AARTI KUMARI AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Balwant Singh, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana.

***

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL)

The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.

2. The petitioner no.1 is stated to have been born on 01.01.2004 and for this purpose, reference has been made to the Aadhaar card (Annexure P-1). The petitioner no.2 is stated to have been born on 01.01.2000 and for the said purpose, reference has been made to the Aadhaar card (Annexure P-2). It is stated that the petitioners are in a “Live in Relationship”. Petitioner No.1 had solemnized marriage with respondent No.4-Raj Kumar and out of the said wedlock one girl child was born Petitioner No.2 is unmarried. And as such, the petitioner No.1 is in a ‘live-

in-relationship’ with petitioner No.2.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has st

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top