IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARAMJEET KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 02.09.2025 PARAMJEET KAUR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Sukhdeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate and Mr. Sohailbeer Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Ankush Singla, Advocate for the complainant.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
51 23.04.2025 City Rampura, District 318(4)/343/61(2)(a) of Bathinda BNS, 2023
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail.
2. Per paragraph 11 of the bail petition, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:
“5. That the brief facts of the case are as under: i. That the present FIR came to be registered on the basis of a complaint dated 04.02.2025 moved by complainant Sanjiv Kumar son of Rajinder Kumar to SSP, Bathinda against Tirath Singh son of Kulwinder Singh, Paramjit Kaur wife of Kulwinder S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.