SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 14847

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARAMJEET KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 02.09.2025 PARAMJEET KAUR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Sukhdeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate and Mr. Sohailbeer Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Ankush Singla, Advocate for the complainant.

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

51 23.04.2025 City Rampura, District 318(4)/343/61(2)(a) of Bathinda BNS, 2023

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail.

2. Per paragraph 11 of the bail petition, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:

“5. That the brief facts of the case are as under: i. That the present FIR came to be registered on the basis of a complaint dated 04.02.2025 moved by complainant Sanjiv Kumar son of Rajinder Kumar to SSP, Bathinda against Tirath Singh son of Kulwinder Singh, Paramjit Kaur wife of Kulwinder S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top