SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 14899

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GURDEV SINGH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-10756-C-2025 in (110 RSA-3038-2025 (O&M)

Date of Decision:-02.09.2025 JAGIR SINGH … Applicant/Appellant Versus GURDEV SINGH AND ANOTHER ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Aman P. Jain, Advocate for the applicant/appellant.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

CM-10756-C-2025

1. The appeal before this Court has been filed with a delay of 1,022 days. The applicant/appellant seeks condonation of such delay on the ground that due to the intervention of certain individuals, the non-applicant/respondents abstained from interfering with the possession of the applicant/appellant, which caused the applicant/appellant to desist from prosecuting the matter any further within the stipulated period. It is only upon the recent resumption of interference by the non-applicants/respondents in the appellant’s possession that the present appeal has been instituted. The application is accompanied by an affidavit affirmed by Sh. Jagir Singh, attesting to the facts stated therein.

2. Section 3 of the Limitation Act lays down that no suit, appeal or application instituted, preferred or made after the period pres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top