240 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-942-2018 Date of decision: 03.09.2025 Priya Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus Hem Lata and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Akshit Mehta, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Yash Dev Kaushik, Advocate for the respondents.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 04.12.2017 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Faridabad whereby an application filed by the respondents/defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint on the ground of non-payment of ad valorem Court fees, has been allowed and the petitioners-plaintiffs have been directed to pay ad valorem Court fees as per the sale consideration in the sale deed dated 28.01.2015.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the present case, the petitioners had filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction with the averment that the sale deed executed by the defendants with the present pe