In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

321 Date of Decision:- 03.09.2025 Susham Lata and another … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents [State of Haryana and others (mentioned in MOP)]

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present:- Mr. S.K. Panwar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Karan Vir Nanda, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*****

RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (Oral)

1. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of FIR No.15 dated 23.01.2020, under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 120-B of IPC registered at Police Station City Rupnagar, District Rupnagar along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 26.11.2022 (Annexure P-2). Further prayer has been made for staying the further proceedings before the trial Court.

2. At the at outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that State of Haryana is impleaded as party wherein FIR has been registered in Rupnagar, Punjab.

3. On the oral request made by learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent No.1 be read as ‘State of Punjab’ instead of ‘State of Haryana’.

4. Registry is directed to carry out