IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (218)

FAO-6646-2012 Date of decision:- 03.09.2025 Raavi Devi ...Appellant Versus Gurmel Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Ashwani Arora, Advocate, and Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Lalit Garg, Advocate for respondent No.-Insurance Company.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Widow of the deceased-Abdul Mazid has filed the present appeal challenging the award dated 14.09.2012, vide which the claim petition filed by the present appellant had been dismissed only on account of the fact that the appellant/claimant could not prove the negligence on the part of respondent No.1.

2. The fact that the motorcycle bearing registration No.PB65-C- 0434 was involved in the accident fact, that respondent No.1 was the driver of the said motorcycle, respondent No.2 was the owner of the said motorcycle and that it was insured with respondent No.3 has not been disputed before this Court. It is jointly submitted that the only issue which arises for consideration before this Court is the amount of compensation to which the present appellant is entitled to.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant