SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 202

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUKESH – Appellant
Versus
BALDEV SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :-02.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement:-04.09.2025 Mukesh … Appellant Versus Baldev Singh ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The appellant/defendant has instituted the present appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 04.10.2014 rendered by the learned Additional District Judge, Jhajjar, whereby the learned First Appellate Court reversed and set aside the well-reasoned judgment and decree dated 13.08.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bahadurgarh.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit for possession, along with consequential relief of permanent injunction, on the grounds that he is the owner in possession of Plot No. 1309, situated within the Awadi of Village Bhaproda, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar. The plot, as delineated in the site plan marked ‘EFGD’, is bounded on the east by Plot Nos. 1312 and 1310, on the west by a Gali and Plot No. 1308, on the north by Pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top