SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11211

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VISHAL AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SUNITA AND OTHERS – Respondent


212-A IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1763-2024 Date of decision: 04.09.2025 Vishal and others ...Petitioners Versus Sunita and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate and Mr. Saurav Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Lajpat Rai Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 04.03.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Ganaur, Sonepat, vide which an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC (Annexure P-3) filed by the petitioners/defendants for amendment in the written statement has been dismissed.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS:-

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the present case, the suit was filed by respondent No.1-Sunita on 21.08.2018 on the plea that her father-in-law was the owner of the property and she had a registered Will dated 10.01.1997 in her favour. It is submitted that the written statement was filed in the said case and in the said written statement, inadvertently, the petitioners did not take t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top