SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 242

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KAMLESH KUMARI AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
BHIM SINGH AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (107)

CR-6095-2017 Date of Decision: - 08.09.2025 Kamlesh Kumari and others ....Petitioners Versus Bhim Singh and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Sanjay Majithia, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sumit Sinha, Advocate for the petitioners.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of impugned order dated 09.08.2017 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mukerian whereby the application for recalling of the order dated 16.01.2017 vide which the evidence of petitioners has been closed has been dismissed.

2. On 11.09.2017, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order: -

“Present: Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

****

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the evidence of the defendants was closed by order of the Court on 16.1.2017 after granting four opportunities and application for recalling of the same was dismissed by the trial Court on 9.8.2017. In the meantime, defendants were proceeded against ex parte on 22.2.2017 and the said order w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top