374 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 08-09-2025 Hemant Karkra alias Honey and others ........Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. T.S. Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jatin Kundu, AAG, Punjab.

***

ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (Oral)

FIR Dated Police Station Sections No.

101 27.8.2024 City Rampura, District 109, 125, 324(4), 351(2), 191(3) and Bathinda 190 BNS and 25 and 27 Arms Act.

The petitioner(s), arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person(s).

2. During the pendency of the criminal proceedings, the accused and the aggrieved person(s) have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.

3. After that, the petitioner(s) came up before this Court to quash the FIR, impleading the aggrieved persons as respondent nos.2 to 4.

ANALYSIS & REASONING:

4. The State’s counsel has filed reply and severely opposed this compromise and seeks dismissal of the petition because