SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 18549

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ROHTASH @ ROHIT SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 08.09.2025 Rohtash @ Rohit Sharma ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. R.K. Samyal, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.80 dated 07.02.2023, under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC and Section 3 of the Haryana Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2013 (added later on) registered at Police Station Thanesar Sadar, District Kurukshetra.

2. On 25.04.2023, the following order was passed:-

“Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of CEPC praying for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No 0080 dated 07.02.2023 registered under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of Haryana Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2013 (added later on) at Police Station Thanesan Sadar. District Kuruksh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top