IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ROHTASH @ ROHIT SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 08.09.2025 Rohtash @ Rohit Sharma ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. R.K. Samyal, Advocate for the complainant.
*****
SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.80 dated 07.02.2023, under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC and Section 3 of the Haryana Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2013 (added later on) registered at Police Station Thanesar Sadar, District Kurukshetra.
2. On 25.04.2023, the following order was passed:-
“Present petition has been filed under Section 438 of CEPC praying for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No 0080 dated 07.02.2023 registered under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of Haryana Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2013 (added later on) at Police Station Thanesan Sadar. District Kuruksh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.