[319] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 08.09.2025 Anjali Foundation …Petitioner versus Anil Mehra ….Respondent Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saksham Mahajan, Advocate and Ms. Shruti Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Parmanand Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Ambanshu Sahni, Advocate for the respondent.

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

[1] This is third revision petition filed by the tenant on the issue of assessment of provisional rent. Earlier tenant came before this Court, challenging order dated 16.03.2022 passed by the Appellate Authority, Gurugram, affirming order dated 25.02.2022. The revision petition was allowed on the limited issue regarding inclusion of rent for the period prior to December, 2018 being beyond pleadings.

[2] The operative part of the order passed by this Court reads as under:-

“10. In view of the aforesaid dictum at the time of assessing in excess or in deficient, the set off has to be granted at the time of final adjudication. In the present case, there are account statements on record relied upon by both the parties and the same are yet to be proved. In given circu