SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 15493

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIJAY KUMAR GIRDHAR AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY KUMAR JAIN AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 08.09.2025 Vijay Kumar Girdhar and others ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Vijay Kumar Jain and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. H.S.Kohli, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Sumeet Jain, Advocate for the caveator/respondents.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Civil Revision under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiffs against the order dated 27.05.2025 whereby application (Annexure P-23) filed by the petitioners under Section 151 CPC for recalling of order dated 04.07.2024; whereby evidence of the petitioners had been closed by Court order; and praying for permitting the petitioner/plaintiffs to lead evidence; has been dismissed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurugram.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in passing the impugned order and not recalling the order dated 04.07.2024, learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Gurugram failed to appreciate that order dated 04.07.2024 had been passed without jurisdiction in-as-much as pecuniary jurisdiction of the said Court had changed. As such, evidence of the plaintiffs could not have been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top