SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 04.09.2025 Pronounced on: 10.09.2025 DHEERAJ AND OTHERS …Petitioners V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. R.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kshitij Bharti, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

None for respondent No. 2.

SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J. (ORAL)

This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.

617 dated 11.07.2017 under Sections 323, 498-A, 406, 506, 376, 120-B and 34 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Model Town Panipat and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, qua the petitioners.

The facts, as narrated by respondent No. 2 in the first report to the police are that complainant was married with accused-Manish on 11.03.2016 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. At the time of marriage, her parents paid Rs. 7,00,000/-, beyond their capacity and sufficient household articles were given in dowry. Soon after the marriage, the in-laws started harassing her for dowry. Her father-in-law, mother-in-law demanded gold jewellery, cash etc. and when she expressed inability, she was beaten up. The mother-in-law kept her jew

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top