SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 43

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAMESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14629-1999 (O&M)

Date of decision: 10.09.2025 Ramesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus The Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (P.U.D.A.)

....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manpreet Singh Longia, Advocate for the respondent.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the impugned order dated 13.09.1999 (Annexure P-7) vide which the claim of the petitioner for assigning him seniority w.e.f. 09.11.1982 i.e. the date on which the petitioner was promoted as Section Officer has been rejected. Further a writ of mandamus has been sought, directing the respondents to assign seniority to the petitioner in the cadre of Section Officer (Works) w.e.f. 09.11.1982 i.e. the date on which the petitioner was promoted as Section Officer and also to direct the respondents to grant all the consequential benefits to the petitioner arising therefrom. Further a writ of prohibition has been sought to restrain the resp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top